Patented products raise a different set of questions from patents themselves.
The owner's question is what they can stop others doing. The purchaser's question is what they may do with the thing they bought.
The answers are more generous than people assume. Buying from an authorised source exhausts the patent holder's rights in that item, so using, reselling and repairing it are all permitted.
What you may not do is make another one. Exhaustion attaches to the item, not to the technology.
What the marking actually tells you
| Marking | Means |
|---|---|
| "Pat. 10,456,789" | A granted patent, identified |
| "Patents: example.com/patents" | Virtual marking — check the page |
| "Patent pending" | An application on file; nothing enforceable |
| "Patented" with no number | Unverifiable |
| Several numbers | Several patents, each probably narrow |
| Nothing at all | Does not mean unpatented |
Marking is optional. Failing to mark limits the owner's damages for the period before actual notice, which is a penalty on them rather than a signal to you.
A number is checkable in minutes. Look it up in Google Patents or USPTO Patent Public Search and read the independent claims. See patent number.
What the numbers on a product tell you
| Observation | Inference |
|---|---|
| One number | One feature protected |
| Several numbers | Several features, each narrow |
| A D-prefixed number | Appearance protected |
| "Patent pending" | An application, nothing enforceable |
| A virtual marking URL | Check the page — it may be current |
| An old product, old numbers | Likely expired — check |
| No marking | Says nothing either way |
More numbers does not mean broader protection. It usually means several narrow claims covering several features, each of which can be avoided independently.
Virtual marking pages are more reliable than moulded numbers, because they can be corrected when patents lapse. See patent marking.
A patent usually covers one feature
| Assumption | Reality |
|---|---|
| The whole product is protected | Usually one mechanism or composition |
| Four numbers means four patents on the product | Four narrow claims on four features |
| Nobody can make anything similar | Competitors work outside the claims |
| The title describes the coverage | The title has no legal effect |
A product titled as a filtration system may be covered by a patent claiming only a valve seat geometry. Everything else about it is unprotected.
Which is why reading the claims matters if the question is whether you can build something similar rather than whether you can use what you bought.
Exhaustion: what buying gives you
An authorised first sale exhausts the patent holder's rights in that item.
| You may | You may not |
|---|---|
| Use it | Make another one |
| Resell it | Reconstruct a spent article |
| Repair it | — |
| Modify it for your own use | Manufacture the patented feature separately |
| Import it, if bought abroad from an authorised seller | Import from an unauthorised maker |
| Lend or give it away | — |
Exhaustion follows the article. Buying one authorised unit gives no right to produce more, however thoroughly you understand it.
The source matters. If the seller was not authorised by the patent holder, exhaustion does not apply and using the item can infringe.
International exhaustion
| Purchase | US rights exhausted? |
|---|---|
| From the patent holder in the US | Yes |
| From an authorised licensee in the US | Yes |
| From the patent holder abroad | Yes — Impression Products v. Lexmark |
| From an authorised foreign licensee | Yes |
| From an unauthorised maker anywhere | No |
Impression Products settled this in 2017. An authorised sale anywhere in the world exhausts the holder's US patent rights in that item, so parallel importing an authorised product is permitted as a patent matter.
Customs and trademark issues are separate. Exhaustion answers the patent question and not necessarily the others.
Single-use and post-sale restrictions
| Restriction | Enforceable as a patent matter? |
|---|---|
| "Single use only" | No, after an authorised sale |
| "Not for resale" | No |
| "Return after use" | No |
| Contractual undertaking you signed | Possibly, as contract |
Impression Products also settled this. A patent holder cannot use patent law to enforce post-sale restrictions once they have sold the item, even where the restriction was clearly stated.
Contract is a different route. A term you actually agreed to may bind you personally, but it does not travel with the item to a subsequent buyer.
Repair versus reconstruction
| Activity | Generally |
|---|---|
| Replacing a worn consumable | Permitted repair |
| Replacing a broken component | Permitted repair |
| Replacing several components over time | Usually repair |
| Refurbishing for resale | Frequently repair |
| Rebuilding from a spent article | Reconstruction — infringes |
| Making a new article using one old part | Reconstruction |
The test is whether the article as a whole was spent and whether what was done amounts to making a new one.
Repair is a real right, not a tolerance. It follows from exhaustion, and it is what makes an aftermarket parts industry possible.
Aftermarket suppliers are more exposed than repairers. A part designed to fit only one patented assembly may fail the staple article defence. See contributory patent infringement.
Design patents on products
| Utility patent on a product | Design patent | |
|---|---|---|
| Prefix | None | D |
| Covers | How it works | How it looks |
| Term | 20 years from filing | 15 years from grant |
| Maintenance fees | Three | None |
| Almost always in force? | No — 58.6% lapse | Yes |
| Stops | Functionally equivalent products | Products that look the same |
A D-prefixed number is far more likely to be live than a plain number of similar age, because no fees are due and nothing can be missed.
It also restricts something different. A design patent stops a lookalike, not a functional equivalent that looks different — which is the opposite of what most purchasers assume. See types of patents.
Checking whether the patent is still live
| Step | Where | Time |
|---|---|---|
| Read the number | The product | 1 min |
| Confirm the patent exists | Google Patents | 2 min |
| Read the independent claims | Full text | 15 min |
| Check maintenance fee status | USPTO Patent Center | 3 min |
| Check current ownership | USPTO Assignment Search | 5 min |
| Ipiry Patent Survival Curve v1.0 | Rate |
|---|---|
| Survive the 3.5-year fee (2022 cohort) | 85.8% |
| Survive the 7.5-year fee (2018 cohort) | 64.6% |
| Reach full term (2014 cohort) | 41.4% |
| Abandoned before full term | 58.6% |
Computed from 27,273,654 USPTO maintenance fee records covering 8,262,336 US utility patents — see the patent survival curve.
Markings outlive patents routinely. Nearly three in five utility patents lapse before term, while moulded numbers stay on products for years afterwards.
Marking with an expired patent is expressly excused from false marking liability where the patent once covered the article, so a stale number is usually an oversight rather than a deception.
Worked example: a marked appliance
A kitchen appliance marked with three patent numbers.
| Number | Type | Claims cover | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9,xxx,xxx | Utility | A specific blade geometry | Expired 2023 |
| 10,xxx,xxx | Utility | The locking mechanism | In force |
| D8xx,xxx | Design | Ornamental appearance | In force |
What that means for a purchaser
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| Can I use it? | Yes — exhausted |
| Can I resell it? | Yes |
| Can I repair it, including the lock? | Yes — repair |
| Can I rebuild one from scrapped units? | No — reconstruction |
| Can I manufacture the blade geometry? | Yes — that patent expired |
| Can I manufacture the locking mechanism? | No — in force |
| Can I make something that looks the same? | No — design patent in force |
| Can I make a functionally identical product that looks different? | Yes, if it avoids the locking claim |
Three numbers, three different answers. The expired one restricts nothing, the utility one restricts the mechanism, and the design one restricts the appearance only.
Twenty minutes of free lookups produced all of it. The marking alone would have suggested the whole appliance was protected.
If you want to make something similar
A different question entirely, and exhaustion does not help.
| Step | Why |
|---|---|
| Read every independent claim | Scope lives there |
| Compare element by element | One missing element defeats literal infringement |
| Check the prosecution history | Narrowing limits how broadly claims are read |
| Check for pending continuations | New claims can still be written |
| Check the family for foreign equivalents | Rights are national |
| Get an opinion before launching | Defence against enhanced damages |
Adding features never avoids infringement. Almost all claims use "comprising", which is open, so a product containing everything claimed plus more still infringes. See infringe the patent.
Buying used and refurbished
| Scenario | Position |
|---|---|
| Buying second-hand from a legitimate first owner | Exhausted — fine |
| Buying refurbished | Generally fine, if repair not reconstruction |
| Buying parts to repair your own unit | Fine |
| Buying a unit assembled from scrapped parts | Potentially infringing |
| Buying a counterfeit | Infringing, plus trademark issues |
The chain matters. Exhaustion depends on the first sale having been authorised, so a second-hand item originally sold by the patent holder carries clean rights however many times it has changed hands since.
Refurbishment sits on the repair line. Replacing worn parts and reselling is generally permitted; assembling units from spent components is not.
Products marked with foreign patents
| Marking | Means |
|---|---|
| A US number | US rights only |
| An EP number | European rights, no US effect |
| Multiple country numbers | A family, filed in several markets |
| A number with no country code | Ambiguous — check |
| A virtual marking page listing several countries | Read the page |
A foreign patent number on a product sold in the US restricts nothing there. Rights are national, and a European patent gives no US rights whatever.
Numbers repeat across countries, so a bare number without a country code is genuinely ambiguous. US 9,000,000 and EP 9,000,000 are unrelated documents. See patent number.
Patented products: the checklist
- Treat the marking as a starting point. It says a patent exists, not what it covers.
- Read the independent claims if the coverage matters to you. They are free to read.
- Check maintenance fee status. Markings outlive patents, and 58.6% lapse early.
- Buying from an authorised source exhausts the rights in that item — use, resell and repair freely.
- Do not confuse repair with reconstruction. Rebuilding a spent article is making a new one.
- Ignore post-sale single-use restrictions as a patent matter, but check whether you agreed to them contractually.
- Authorised foreign purchases exhaust US rights in that item since Impression Products.
- Check the prefix. A D-prefixed design patent covers appearance only.
- Unmarked does not mean unpatented. Marking is optional.
- If you want to build something similar, that is a different analysis — compare element by element and get an opinion before launching.